What is the theory of reflective equilibrium?

What is the theory of reflective equilibrium?

In philosophy, the concept of reflective equilibrium refers to a process by which we try to figure out how we know if something is morally right or not and whether our beliefs about what is moral are consistent. We might think that we can’t really debate moral issues. We think we know what is right or wrong.

What does Rawls mean by the veil of ignorance?

Philosopher John Rawls suggests that we should imagine we sit behind a veil of ignorance that keeps us from knowing who we are and identifying with our personal circumstances. By being ignorant of our circumstances, we can more objectively consider how societies should operate.

What is an example of the veil of ignorance?

So, for example, the veil of ignorance would lead people to refuse slavery, because even though slavery is very convenient for slave-owners, for slaves, not so much, and since behind the veil of ignorance one would not know whether they would be a slave or a slave-owner, they would refuse slavery.

What is the problem with the veil of ignorance?

‘The Veil of Ignorance hides information that makes us who we are. Behind the Veil, we are not individuals, and so any decision we reach is meaningless.

What does Rawls’s mean by reflective equilibrium?

Rather, he says, to be of interest to moral philosophy, a reflective equilibrium should seek what results from challenging existing beliefs by arguments and implications that derive from the panoply of developed positions in moral and political philosophy (Rawls A Theory of Justice 2nd Edition, 1999, p.

What is Rawls’s reflective equilibrium?

Wide reflective equilibrium, first introduced by Rawls, has been described by Norman Daniels as “a method that attempts to produce coherence in ordered triple sets of beliefs held by a particular person, namely: (a) a set of considered moral judgments, (b) a set of moral principles, and (c) a set of relevant ( …

Is the veil of ignorance good or bad?

Across 7 experiments with over 6,000 participants, we show that veil-of-ignorance reasoning leads to choices that favor the greater good. Veil-of-ignorance reasoning makes people more likely to donate to a more effective charity and to favor saving more lives in a bioethical dilemma.

Is the veil of ignorance a thought experiment?

The Veil of Ignorance (sometimes referred to as “the original position”) is a thought experiment popularized by 20-century philosopher John Rawls with the goal of thinking more clearly and impartially about the fair organizing principles of a society based on solidarity.

What is reflective equilibrium example?

For example, if we find out that a baby has been murdered, we might think that this is terrible and feel quite bad about it. Given a moral intuition, the method of reflective equilibrium says that we should try to generalize and come up with a general moral principle that explains this intuition.

What is reflective equilibrium quizlet?

Reflective equilibrium is a state of balance or coherence among a set of beliefs arrived at by a process of deliberative mutual adjustment among general principles and particular judgments.

What is the main idea of Rawls theory of justice as fairness?

“Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical” is an essay by John Rawls, published in 1985. In it he describes his conception of justice. It comprises two main principles of liberty and equality; the second is subdivided into Fair Equality of Opportunity and the Difference Principle.

What is the main function of the veil of ignorance quizlet?

The purpose of the “veil of ignorance” in Rawls’s thought experiment is to illustrate what social principles people in society would chose if they had a clear indication of all of the consequences of all of their choices.

When philosophers reflect on morality they try to achieve reflective equilibrium How would they know they have achieved it quizlet?

When philosophers reflect on morality, they try to achieve reflective equilibrium. How would they know they have achieved it? One’s considered moral judgements can be mistaken. Ethical egoism says that the morally right action is the one that produces the most favorable balance of good over evil for oneself.

What are the three principles of Rawls?

Rawls orders the principles of justice lexically, as follows: 1, 2b, 2a. The greatest equal liberty principle takes priority, followed by the equal opportunity principle and finally the difference principle.

What are the two principles of justice that Rawls mentioned?

The first principle guarantees the right of each person to have the most extensive basic liberty compatible with the liberty of others. The second principle states that social and economic positions are to be (a) to everyone’s advantage and (b) open to all.

What does the theory of the veil of ignorance Express?

The Veil of Ignorance, a component of social contract theory, allows us to test ideas for fairness. Behind the Veil of Ignorance, no one knows who they are. They lack clues as to their class, their privileges, their disadvantages, or even their personality.

What is the relevance of original position and veil of ignorance in Rawls theory of justice?

Citizens making choices about their society are asked to make them from an “original position” of equality (left) behind a “veil of ignorance” (wall, center), without knowing what gender, race, abilities, tastes, wealth, or position in society they will have (right).

What are Rawls two principles of justice explained?

Rawls contends that the most rational choice for the parties in the original position are two principles of justice: The first guarantees the equal basic rights and liberties needed to secure the fundamental interests of free and equal citizens and to pursue a wide range of conceptions of the good.