Is BMC peer-reviewed?
BMC Public Health operates a transparent peer-review system, where, if the article is published, the reviewer reports are published online alongside the article under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 but the reviewer is not named.
Is systematic reviews a good journal?
The overall rank of Systematic Reviews is 4438. According to SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), this journal is ranked 0.947.
Are systematic reviews reliable?
A high-quality systematic review is described as the most reliable source of evidence to guide clinical practice. The purpose of a systematic review is to deliver a meticulous summary of all the available primary research in response to a research question.
Is BMC a reputable journal?
BioMed Central (BMC) is a United Kingdom-based, for-profit scientific open access publisher that produces over 250 scientific journals. All its journals are published online only….BioMed Central.
| Parent company | Springer Nature |
|---|---|
| Publication types | Scientific journals |
| Nonfiction topics | Science |
| Official website | www.biomedcentral.com |
Is BMC a quality publication?
A pioneer of open access publishing, BMC has an evolving portfolio of high quality peer-reviewed journals including broad interest titles such as BMC Biology and BMC Medicine, specialist journals such as Malaria Journal and Microbiome, and the BMC Series.
What is the value of a systematic review?
The main value of systematic reviews is to strengthen or clarify conclusions previously published on a particular topic by increasing the statistical power through collective analysis. If the systematic review does not accomplish this, the authors should reconsider submitting the review for publication.
Why are systematic reviews the best?
Systematic reviews systematically evaluate and summarize current knowledge and have many advantages over narrative reviews. Meta-analyses provide a more reliable and enhanced precision of effect estimate than do individual studies.
What is a weakness of a systematic review?
For some review topics, however, the strengths of the systematic review may turn into weaknesses. The primary problem is that the narrow focus and prescribed methods of the systematic review do not allow for comprehensive coverage.
What are the disadvantages of a systematic review?
Cons of systematic literature reviews Often more time-consuming than other types of review. Transparency of the methodology and search strategy enhance the replicability of the review. Grey literature (such as government reports and policy documents) are not usually included, which may bias perspectives.
Is BMC indexed in PubMed?
Like the other journals in the BMC stable, BMC Medicine is an open access journal, funded by article processing fees. The journal is abstracted and indexed in CAS, BIOSIS, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded and Scopus.
Is BMC predatory publisher?
While Publishers such as Frontiers In, PLoS, BMC exploit the open access model, using the open access model does not make you predatory… you may buy open access in Nature and in Science… these are not predatory.
Is BMC a scholarly source?
BMC Research Notes is an open access journal publishing peer-reviewed contributions from across all scientific and clinical disciplines, including intriguing initial observations, updates to previous work and established methods, valid negative results, and scientific data sets and descriptions.
How many papers are needed for a systematic review?
Basically, there is no limit on number of studies for a systematic review. For a meta-analysis, you can practically do it with 2 or more. However, generally speaking, a MA of less than 4 or 5 studies of controversial benefit.
What’s wrong with systematic reviews?
Fragmented evidence Another major part of the problem with systematic reviews and meta-analyses is that these publications often try to piece together fragments of information from multiple primary studies that are inherently different[11] without highlighting differences in these studies.